Monday, January 18, 2010

Does the Virginia Tech tragedy change your opinion on gun control?

I saw this poll on the myfoxla.com website and thought it was interesting.





I'm a little confused though---- Does gun control mean that we want more restrictions on who can get a gun or does it mean we want less restrictions?





Please answer the initial question and provide any information you can give me to clarify. Thank you!





----------------------Survey Taken from the MyFoxLA.com Website----------------------





Does the Virginia Tech tragedy change your opinion on gun control?





Poll Results:


Yes, we need increased gun control 7.33%


Yes, we need less gun control 77.15%


No, it doesn't change my opinion either way 15.52%


Total number of votes: 2714Does the Virginia Tech tragedy change your opinion on gun control?
I think the government should stop stepping in on gun control, because whatever they do there will still be a huge amount of guns already in our system. Nothing is going to stop guns from being sold to retards because retards always find a way. What the government needs to do is find the retards before they get their hands on guns and show um WHY THIS COUNTRY DONT **** AROUNDDoes the Virginia Tech tragedy change your opinion on gun control?
No, it is a state by state issue anyways.
No, because people will always be able to get guns no matter how you ban them. We need to get to the source of the problem. CRAZY PEOPLE who are let loose and ignored.
Gun control is an umbrella term used to discribe the level of restrictions on firearms.
No. My position didn't change. It's wrong to let your emotional response to a tragedy change your political philosophy.
gun control- always use two hands, breathe, sight in and use a slow steady squeeze. BAM the shot is fired and if you used good gun control you should hit what your aiming at.
Not much. That depends on which state you are talking about. California %26amp; NYC are too strict. but Vermont %26amp; Alaska are too lax.





It bothers me that a man who was determined to be ';a danger to himself or others'; was allowed to get a gun. There were warning signs going off all over the place that this guy was a ticking time-bomb. He should have not been able to get a gun so easily.





But I am in favor of safe, law-abiding citizens being allowed to carry a gun. If one of the teachers or other students had a gun, the death toll would be greatly reduced. http://www.gunownersalliance.com/hupp-10鈥?/a>
no we don't need gun control we need stronger rules on who can have them, the killer was crazy, he should have had a mental evaluation before he was even sold a gun or to even get a permit.
this situation is very upsetting, but no it does not change my opinion on gun controll. it dows however change my opinion on ';national security'; if the students would have been notified about the 1st shooting in a more effictive manner then there probably wouldn't have been as nearly many deaths.
no we need less gun control
  • makeup tips
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment